Legal claims against construction principals: multiple and varied

| Jan 14, 2021 | Construction Disputes

Some business spheres are relatively simple and confined.

Not the construction realm.

In fact, the construction industry across Pennsylvania and the rest of the country is marked immediately by its sheer variance and complexity. Construction work nationally is a 24/7 endeavor of almost unimaginable type and scope.

That is readily apparent by the nonstop work engaged in by industry principals. Millions of workers toil daily on commercial, residential and municipal projects of vast variety.

And the business actors in one of the nation’s most dynamic commercial sectors comprise materially diverse participants. One Pennsylvania legal source addressing breach and damage claims in the construction industry spotlights the wide pool of principals. It notes that disputes routinely involve “construction companies, developers, insurance companies, contractors, architects and others.”

Construction claims cover wide and diverse terrain

Given the nearly limitless type of construction activity that proceeds nonstop across the country, it is unsurprising that emergent claims cover a wide universe of alleged wrongdoing. Construction realm disputes often involve matters such as these:

  • Project delay
  • Cost, billing and payment issues
  • Disputes with and between contractors and subcontractors
  • Project “size and scope” modifications
  • Property damage
  • Personal injury claims
  • Construction defects

Today’s post zeroes in on that last bulleted entry, spotlighting commonly alleged defects that can become material concerns in any construction project.

Construction defects: commonly cited, but not always proven

A significant project defect is obviously a big deal. An outsized error can materially thwart or even derail a project. Moreover, a party defending against a defect allegation can face a business-ending level of risk.

An in-depth breach and damage claims in the construction industry notes just how serious leveled charges can be. A sizable defect can prove injurious to a claimant, of course, but a defect allegation can also be flatly damaging to a business principal or entity defending against such a claim. Candidly, many claims lack merit and are not grounded in reasonable proof.

Proven attorneys providing diligent legal representation to Pennsylvania construction companies and other key industry participants defending against defect claims and other allegations note the sheer importance of a staunch defense.

An established legal team with a demonstrated record of advocacy on behalf of diverse industry clients will strive to forge optimal results in any construction dispute. A best-case outcome can be pursued via a litigated strategy, through an alternative dispute resolution process such as mediation or arbitration or by a settlement sometimes secured more informally through effective negotiation.